North Korea: should Trump be thanked for clearing his own mess?

Last Updated on

Friends and enemies often swap sides and end up respecting each other. It is an age-old theme in Hollywood blockbusters like Star Wars and Enemy at the Gates. This is because aggression, unlike indifference, establishes a relationship between two individuals who can often end up respecting each-other’s tenacity – hence the popular expression regarding love and hate being two parts of the same coin.

We see this peculiar dynamic of mutual respect between two leaders whose broader respectability is generally questionable: Donald Trump and Kim Jong-un.





Part of a broader phenomenon of challenging the status quo, Trump was arguably elected for his brash, “rough round the edges” brand that challenges conventional politics, however incompetent this challenge may be. However, “rough round the edges” comes with its own pitfalls.

***

Through his Twitter storms, Donald Trump earlier threw verbal jibes at Kim Jong-un, once claiming that his nuclear “button” (as if nuclear deployment is not a deeply complicated process) was bigger than that of North Korea. Almost like a child with a deeper, underlying inferiority complex.

The crisis grew very tense, with many genuinely fearful of what two largely irrational individuals with “their hands” on nuclear weapons could exactly be capable of.

Then things soon became clearer.

***

It is an age-old political strategy to create an issue, resolve it, then expect praise from the wider public. During the Cold War, British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher renewed relationships with the US and seized back control of Britain’s colonial territory in the Falkland Islands.

This added to growing tensities with the Soviet Union, only for Margaret Thatcher to then establish herself as an ally and mentor of Mikhail Gorbachev, sparking the dissolution of Soviet Russia.

***

In the US’ own “Cold War” with North Korea, Trump has now U-turned and entered denuclearisation discussions with Kim Jong-un. Since, he has not stopped signposting these discussions in person and on social media.

The bare minimum that Trump should be doing as President is clearing any crisis he has contributed to. This is not an admirable action, nor a favour, rather what is expected as a minimal standard from the leader of the most influential country in the world.

More Articles for You

Iran: politics of pragmatism & Arab parallels

Last Updated on 28/06/2020 at 2:46 amSince the existence of independent nation states in the Middle East and North Africa, …

What is Apartheid Off Campus?

Last Updated on 04/06/2020 at 11:55 amApartheid Off Campus is a growing network of young activists across the United Kingdom, students leading the struggle to end their own universities’ complicity in the Israeli apartheid regime (hafrada, or …

On France’s “Arab problem”

Last Updated on 23/05/2020 at 1:50 amA recurring theme throughout Arab literature is exile. Being far from home, far from …

Tunisia’s economy before and after the Arab Spring

Last Updated on 04/05/2020 at 5:17 amThe 2011 Jasmine Revolution ousted Ben Ali’s autocracy and introduced full democratic rule in …

The reality of war in Libya

Last Updated on 19/04/2020 at 1:16 amIf one could personify Libya as a victim of cancer, this patient would have …

Brexit Britain and Egyptian nationalism: a comparative analysis

Last Updated on 24/03/2020 at 2:05 amThere are a lot of things in the world today that seem utterly upside …